Are not women funny?
In yesterday's Daily News Magazine, my preferred reading seemed a wonderfully provocative article. I just want to hope hard that really is not the scribbler of this opinion. I tried to find the link, apparently are not current but article online. We have in school, however, is access to a database, this will change so soon.
shirred short, the journalist claims that women are not funny. Point. Much more is unfortunately not really behind it, the article suggests, however, to think. "
there anything better than a letter, I thought to myself, and cut straight to the keys:
, why women are not funny '
letter to the Magi Tagi-products by Reto Hunziker from issue no. 20
Oh woe, oh woe. As yet, an article starts promising with a lot of provocative title and then this: A two-page long, the author stumbles from one foot in the next. Rows of hypotheses are, coming along while moderately entertaining, but equally unfounded. want to be the claim that women do not seem funny / / to be can, like an irrefutable law of nature runs through the whole text. How cute naive. But maybe a little pathetic:
Obviously it is not with the female image of the author far away. He describes the female character as a hodgepodge pleasant but pale gray qualities. Women are essential to the love life, pretty ladies smiling model. You have an intuitive feel for portioning in discussions hard chunks into bite pieces. All well and good. The fact that the comedy landscape is dominated by men, should also underpin the entire thesis. Only one should perhaps add here that even in other professions that enjoy a certain scarcity value, are associated with a lower percentage of women. And just because sitting in most boardrooms men, hopefully no one would argue that women are just stupid, right? Well, Mr. Hunziker would perhaps justify this with the fact that, fighting spirit and courage typical male attributes' are that this is an open question. I must however agree with him
that humor and wit do not quite fit the image of pleasure object. Presumably this is because the humor and intelligence are dangerously close to each other. And as the saying goes? "A clever woman has millions of born enemies: All the stupid men." Who said that? Marie von Ebner-Eschenbach, the proud owner of two X-chromosomes.
'm curious whether the print that! ;)
Sunday, May 21, 2006
Watch Online Mysore Malige
The Da Vinci Code - Do not worry, it will not reveal too much ... ;)
I know, I know. About Dan Brown and his books one can argue. Some are content to smile at his novels mild, others praise her in the sky and the third sign of the cross and call it the devil's work. When I read the 'Code' is the first time, I was absolutely thrilled (as in previous Entries readily apparent). Now this book is its suitability for mainstream Hollywood and the faithful contributions but also for me a bitter aftertaste held. Also, yes they always say that some of his are used assumptions about the Grail, the art or the Church either by air or well-known.
Well, whatever: Entertaining is all. And so it was for me finds me out as soon as possible to the film to heart. Thanks and I landed with a friend then, in fact, the top ranking in the Zurich Première.
I must say that I find no justification for ripping Reviews:
Sure, some scenes are full of artificial emotions, but who would have not expected such a huge production? It is also obvious that the material is not easy to handle. Half the book consists of the thoughts of the main character and how would you please pack the very palatable? With a voice-over? No, no. If one looks across on individual vulnerabilities (cute: Langdon's statements on the Mona Lisa are added along the way, because they fit somewhere right, but also must not be left out ...), this film is highly entertaining. And the two and a half hours.
The pace is rapid, but not hastily gathered and sent the story. The actors deliver all worked perfectly. In addition, this production in my opinion, with many charming details is peppered:
- The main characters are trozt impressive driving skills no super heroes. When is the first time a shot so both shrug together, that you realize that they have never experienced this so close
- The special effects are used in an ideal measure! True to the style of 'Beautiful Mind' discussed the code or the image are raised to the fore. Beautiful.
- I think I even have discovered a hidden allusion! * Proud grin * hiding in a scene, Langdon and Sophie in a park teeming with drug addicts and prostitutes - in my opinion, a modern dig at Hieronymus Bosch's "Garden of Earthly Delights' ...
- The dialogues are not as flat as it is stated in the reviews. There are lots of really funny and clever responses statements. Once Teabing says something like: Since there is only one God, one is willing to kill for him.
How true, Mr. George W. bin Laden, how true. What amazes me
absolutely has been the amendment of the conclusion ... Weiss also not yet know what to make of it. The last two minutes, I think more than in the book, the pictures are great and not as cheesy as the original. But the episode in Roselynn Chapel and also the relationship of Langdon and Sophie ... Hmmm ....
who has seen the movie, but I will object to please! :) I look forward to discussions with you.
I know, I know. About Dan Brown and his books one can argue. Some are content to smile at his novels mild, others praise her in the sky and the third sign of the cross and call it the devil's work. When I read the 'Code' is the first time, I was absolutely thrilled (as in previous Entries readily apparent). Now this book is its suitability for mainstream Hollywood and the faithful contributions but also for me a bitter aftertaste held. Also, yes they always say that some of his are used assumptions about the Grail, the art or the Church either by air or well-known.
Well, whatever: Entertaining is all. And so it was for me finds me out as soon as possible to the film to heart. Thanks and I landed with a friend then, in fact, the top ranking in the Zurich Première.
I must say that I find no justification for ripping Reviews:
Sure, some scenes are full of artificial emotions, but who would have not expected such a huge production? It is also obvious that the material is not easy to handle. Half the book consists of the thoughts of the main character and how would you please pack the very palatable? With a voice-over? No, no. If one looks across on individual vulnerabilities (cute: Langdon's statements on the Mona Lisa are added along the way, because they fit somewhere right, but also must not be left out ...), this film is highly entertaining. And the two and a half hours.
The pace is rapid, but not hastily gathered and sent the story. The actors deliver all worked perfectly. In addition, this production in my opinion, with many charming details is peppered:
- The main characters are trozt impressive driving skills no super heroes. When is the first time a shot so both shrug together, that you realize that they have never experienced this so close
- The special effects are used in an ideal measure! True to the style of 'Beautiful Mind' discussed the code or the image are raised to the fore. Beautiful.
- I think I even have discovered a hidden allusion! * Proud grin * hiding in a scene, Langdon and Sophie in a park teeming with drug addicts and prostitutes - in my opinion, a modern dig at Hieronymus Bosch's "Garden of Earthly Delights' ...
- The dialogues are not as flat as it is stated in the reviews. There are lots of really funny and clever responses statements. Once Teabing says something like: Since there is only one God, one is willing to kill for him.
How true, Mr. George W. bin Laden, how true. What amazes me
absolutely has been the amendment of the conclusion ... Weiss also not yet know what to make of it. The last two minutes, I think more than in the book, the pictures are great and not as cheesy as the original. But the episode in Roselynn Chapel and also the relationship of Langdon and Sophie ... Hmmm ....
who has seen the movie, but I will object to please! :) I look forward to discussions with you.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)